Peer Review Process

• PRAMA follows blind peer-review process.
• The primary aims of the peer review process are to: - maintain quality control - protect the reputation of the journal - 'ration' space in as objective and transparent a manner as possible.
• The Editors review all submitted manuscripts initially. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific flaws, or absence of importance of message will be rejected. Manuscript will be sent to two experts/reviewers without revealing the identity of the reviewers to the contributors and vice-versa. 
• Within a period of twelve to fifteen weeks, the contributors will be informed about the reviewers' comments and acceptance/rejection of the manuscript. Papers accepted would be edited for uniformity, consistency, style, grammar, punctuation, and format.

Review Criteria

Each manuscript is evaluated based on the following criteria:

1. Relevance of Title and Research Content
2. Scholarly Quality and Academic Rigor
3. Logical Continuity and Flow of the Article
4. Use of Theory and Conceptual Framework
5. Novelty and Originality of Research
6. Technical Accuracy and Correctness
7. Clarity of Explanation and Illustrations
8. Depth of Critical Analysis
9. Quality and Relevance of References
10. Clarity and Strength of Conclusions